Well, yesterday was the day. All of us were gathered at the courthouse waiting to see the fate that would befall the thief. We were told to be there for 9:30 a.m. with the trial scheduled to start at 10 a.m..
At 11:15 a.m. the Crown attorney who was representing my case, called me and all the witnesses into his office. What happened next defies logic. First, he spent 15 minutes telling us how he could appreciate the feelings that the thief has generated in the building we live in. He went on to say that this woman has "quite the track record" when it comes to complaints around theft. Then, in the same breath, (and get ready for this) he went on to say that he will not be proceeding to trial with this case! When I asked why he mumbled something about "well, the value of the item that was stolen does not warrant it".
I was stunned. I couldn’t think of anything to say. Finally I mumbled something about "it’s the principle" of the thing. No go, the Crown attorney said he is responsible for using government resources responsibly and going to trial would not be a responsible act. Stunned, simply stunned! Instead, the thief had agreed to donate $200 to charity in exchange for not going to trial.
That’s it folks! I’m still fuming on this one. When I asked I was told that I could write his supervisor and asked that his decision be overturned. Come on now, I worked for the government for almost 20 years-I know what good writing to supervisors usually does. Still, I will send off my letter and think about my next step. There has to be one somewhere!